Community Planning Permit System: Participate in simplifying the building approvals process

Share Community Planning Permit System: Participate in simplifying the building approvals process on Facebook Share Community Planning Permit System: Participate in simplifying the building approvals process on Twitter Share Community Planning Permit System: Participate in simplifying the building approvals process on Linkedin Email Community Planning Permit System: Participate in simplifying the building approvals process link

If you are a resident of any of the four townships in Frontenac County, we need your input on the implementation of a new, streamlined, planning application approvals process.

The new system, called the Community Planning Permit System (CPPS), has two major advantages for residents:

We need your guidance and input on the development of CPPS policies to be amended to County and Township Official Plans and for the creation of a CPPS by-law template each township council may use in establishing the rules under which CPPS operates. We need to better understand how you want to see waterfront development in Frontenac occur in the future and which factors you consider most important in managing new development along waterfronts and shorelines.

Please take a few minutes to review this page, plan to attend a local in-person consultation event when they're announced, and subscribe to EngageFrontenac.ca for updates. This project will help shape the future of land development here in Frontenac and your input is critically important.

Background:

In 2023, Frontenac County planning staff received the support of all four Townships to proceed with a CPPS implementation project for waterfront areas across the region. Click here to see an example video of the initial presentation to Township councils.

The CPPS allows zoning by-law amendments, minor variances, and detailed site plan applications to be processed as one application instead of two or three separate processes under the Ontario Planning Act.

It also allows for the regulation of tree and vegetation removal and replanting, as well as regulating other site alteration, which is normally done under separate by-laws under the Ontario Municipal Act.

This system provides:

  • An approvals system to create certainty and transparency for the community, landowners, and developers;
  • More timely approvals for applications that meet certain standards and guidelines;
  • Outcomes that can more closely align with the community vision based on the Official Plan; and,
  • A tool that provides approvals that lead to better environmental protection.

To implement a CPPS, each municipality must adopt an Official Plan Amendment for the CPPS area and pass a Community Planning Permit (CPP) By-Law.

In 2023, County planning staff obtained a commitment from the four Townships to share costs and hire a consulting firm to create a CPP By-Law template that can be delivered to each of the four municipalities and then tailored to their specific needs. All four Township councils passed resolutions to allocate funding and a planning consulting firm, Planscape Inc., was retained to create the template and guide the CPPS implementation process to fruition.

Frontenac County planning staff will lead the management of this project without any costs to the four municipalities. The County GIS group will provide mapping at no cost.

If you are a resident of any of the four townships in Frontenac County, we need your input on the implementation of a new, streamlined, planning application approvals process.

The new system, called the Community Planning Permit System (CPPS), has two major advantages for residents:

We need your guidance and input on the development of CPPS policies to be amended to County and Township Official Plans and for the creation of a CPPS by-law template each township council may use in establishing the rules under which CPPS operates. We need to better understand how you want to see waterfront development in Frontenac occur in the future and which factors you consider most important in managing new development along waterfronts and shorelines.

Please take a few minutes to review this page, plan to attend a local in-person consultation event when they're announced, and subscribe to EngageFrontenac.ca for updates. This project will help shape the future of land development here in Frontenac and your input is critically important.

Background:

In 2023, Frontenac County planning staff received the support of all four Townships to proceed with a CPPS implementation project for waterfront areas across the region. Click here to see an example video of the initial presentation to Township councils.

The CPPS allows zoning by-law amendments, minor variances, and detailed site plan applications to be processed as one application instead of two or three separate processes under the Ontario Planning Act.

It also allows for the regulation of tree and vegetation removal and replanting, as well as regulating other site alteration, which is normally done under separate by-laws under the Ontario Municipal Act.

This system provides:

  • An approvals system to create certainty and transparency for the community, landowners, and developers;
  • More timely approvals for applications that meet certain standards and guidelines;
  • Outcomes that can more closely align with the community vision based on the Official Plan; and,
  • A tool that provides approvals that lead to better environmental protection.

To implement a CPPS, each municipality must adopt an Official Plan Amendment for the CPPS area and pass a Community Planning Permit (CPP) By-Law.

In 2023, County planning staff obtained a commitment from the four Townships to share costs and hire a consulting firm to create a CPP By-Law template that can be delivered to each of the four municipalities and then tailored to their specific needs. All four Township councils passed resolutions to allocate funding and a planning consulting firm, Planscape Inc., was retained to create the template and guide the CPPS implementation process to fruition.

Frontenac County planning staff will lead the management of this project without any costs to the four municipalities. The County GIS group will provide mapping at no cost.

Pose a question

Did we miss a question and answer on our frequently asked questions page? We'll respond to any questions you pose here shortly. 

loader image
Didn't receive confirmation?
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • Share Question from Kaswakamak Lake: What processes are in place to review and identify non-compliance docks and structures? Many properties with multiple new docks , clear cutting to the water and edge, sheds at water’s edge. Other municipalities are on the lake monitoring/ taking pictures. What monitoring does NF complete? What steps are taken for non compliance? on Facebook Share Question from Kaswakamak Lake: What processes are in place to review and identify non-compliance docks and structures? Many properties with multiple new docks , clear cutting to the water and edge, sheds at water’s edge. Other municipalities are on the lake monitoring/ taking pictures. What monitoring does NF complete? What steps are taken for non compliance? on Twitter Share Question from Kaswakamak Lake: What processes are in place to review and identify non-compliance docks and structures? Many properties with multiple new docks , clear cutting to the water and edge, sheds at water’s edge. Other municipalities are on the lake monitoring/ taking pictures. What monitoring does NF complete? What steps are taken for non compliance? on Linkedin Email Question from Kaswakamak Lake: What processes are in place to review and identify non-compliance docks and structures? Many properties with multiple new docks , clear cutting to the water and edge, sheds at water’s edge. Other municipalities are on the lake monitoring/ taking pictures. What monitoring does NF complete? What steps are taken for non compliance? link

    Question from Kaswakamak Lake: What processes are in place to review and identify non-compliance docks and structures? Many properties with multiple new docks , clear cutting to the water and edge, sheds at water’s edge. Other municipalities are on the lake monitoring/ taking pictures. What monitoring does NF complete? What steps are taken for non compliance?

    MB asked 17 days ago

    The Community Planning Permit System (CPPS) is primarily a development review process; designed to evaluate proposed developments to ensure they meet local planning regulations and policies. It is not intended to be an enforcement tool per se. Each municipality is responsible for handling enforcement individually, which means they each have their own methods for monitoring and addressing non-compliance issues. For properties with potential non-compliance issues, such as multiple new docks or alterations to natural landscapes, the specific monitoring and enforcement actions would be determined by the policies and procedures of the individual municipality. My suggestion is to contact the Township of North Frontenac for more information on their enforcement practices by emailing info@northfrontenac.ca. Additional contact details for the Township of North Frontenac are here: Contact Us - Township of North Frontenac.”

  • Share There are numerous examples now on Kashwakamak Lake where properties have been redeveloped where the existing small seasonal cottage has been removed and replaced by a large four season structure and in many cases the new cottages sit right beside the lake and the entire shoreline has been destroyed. I believe in the new process this needs to be addressed by only granting approval for rebuilds if the new building is set back and if the lot does not allow it then they can't rebuild. Of course this new process is meaningless unless meaningful enforcement is in place. Looking at the lake and what is going on currently, it is clear, little to no enforcement occurs. on Facebook Share There are numerous examples now on Kashwakamak Lake where properties have been redeveloped where the existing small seasonal cottage has been removed and replaced by a large four season structure and in many cases the new cottages sit right beside the lake and the entire shoreline has been destroyed. I believe in the new process this needs to be addressed by only granting approval for rebuilds if the new building is set back and if the lot does not allow it then they can't rebuild. Of course this new process is meaningless unless meaningful enforcement is in place. Looking at the lake and what is going on currently, it is clear, little to no enforcement occurs. on Twitter Share There are numerous examples now on Kashwakamak Lake where properties have been redeveloped where the existing small seasonal cottage has been removed and replaced by a large four season structure and in many cases the new cottages sit right beside the lake and the entire shoreline has been destroyed. I believe in the new process this needs to be addressed by only granting approval for rebuilds if the new building is set back and if the lot does not allow it then they can't rebuild. Of course this new process is meaningless unless meaningful enforcement is in place. Looking at the lake and what is going on currently, it is clear, little to no enforcement occurs. on Linkedin Email There are numerous examples now on Kashwakamak Lake where properties have been redeveloped where the existing small seasonal cottage has been removed and replaced by a large four season structure and in many cases the new cottages sit right beside the lake and the entire shoreline has been destroyed. I believe in the new process this needs to be addressed by only granting approval for rebuilds if the new building is set back and if the lot does not allow it then they can't rebuild. Of course this new process is meaningless unless meaningful enforcement is in place. Looking at the lake and what is going on currently, it is clear, little to no enforcement occurs. link

    There are numerous examples now on Kashwakamak Lake where properties have been redeveloped where the existing small seasonal cottage has been removed and replaced by a large four season structure and in many cases the new cottages sit right beside the lake and the entire shoreline has been destroyed. I believe in the new process this needs to be addressed by only granting approval for rebuilds if the new building is set back and if the lot does not allow it then they can't rebuild. Of course this new process is meaningless unless meaningful enforcement is in place. Looking at the lake and what is going on currently, it is clear, little to no enforcement occurs.

    Kashsouthshore asked 19 days ago

    Thank you for your comments. We will add your contribution to the consultation material for the County and Township of North Frontenac.

  • Share There is some discussion regarding floating boathouses. I believe the conversation should be expanded to all boathouses. My view is that that they should not be allowed under any circumstances and that no one should be grandfathered with an old one such that they can modify or change it. Floating boathouses are clearly an example of people skirting existing bylaws. This needs to be fixed immediately as they impact others enjoyment of the water and they do impact the shoreline. on Facebook Share There is some discussion regarding floating boathouses. I believe the conversation should be expanded to all boathouses. My view is that that they should not be allowed under any circumstances and that no one should be grandfathered with an old one such that they can modify or change it. Floating boathouses are clearly an example of people skirting existing bylaws. This needs to be fixed immediately as they impact others enjoyment of the water and they do impact the shoreline. on Twitter Share There is some discussion regarding floating boathouses. I believe the conversation should be expanded to all boathouses. My view is that that they should not be allowed under any circumstances and that no one should be grandfathered with an old one such that they can modify or change it. Floating boathouses are clearly an example of people skirting existing bylaws. This needs to be fixed immediately as they impact others enjoyment of the water and they do impact the shoreline. on Linkedin Email There is some discussion regarding floating boathouses. I believe the conversation should be expanded to all boathouses. My view is that that they should not be allowed under any circumstances and that no one should be grandfathered with an old one such that they can modify or change it. Floating boathouses are clearly an example of people skirting existing bylaws. This needs to be fixed immediately as they impact others enjoyment of the water and they do impact the shoreline. link

    There is some discussion regarding floating boathouses. I believe the conversation should be expanded to all boathouses. My view is that that they should not be allowed under any circumstances and that no one should be grandfathered with an old one such that they can modify or change it. Floating boathouses are clearly an example of people skirting existing bylaws. This needs to be fixed immediately as they impact others enjoyment of the water and they do impact the shoreline.

    Kashsouthshore asked 19 days ago

    Thank you for your comments, Kash. We will add your contribution to the consultation material for the County and Township of North Frontenac. (Each township council will deliberate on CPPS matters separately). 

  • Share When do we see the approvals system? on Facebook Share When do we see the approvals system? on Twitter Share When do we see the approvals system? on Linkedin Email When do we see the approvals system? link

    When do we see the approvals system?

    Paige asked 24 days ago

    Thank you for your question. 

    A draft of the approval workflow is expected to be available prior to the in-person consultation meetings taking place between October and December 2024. 

    Please note that the purpose of this project is to create a template of the Community Planning Permit System document that can be used by each Township. The document and specifics of the approvals process will then be tailored by each Township at a later date. 

    A general workflow is illustrated on the Engage Frontenac Webpage under the Streamlined CPPS Approval Process heading. 

  • Share Where is the indigenous consultation for the water impact and Fisheries and Oceans 🇨🇦? Not just the land use when on the water. on Facebook Share Where is the indigenous consultation for the water impact and Fisheries and Oceans 🇨🇦? Not just the land use when on the water. on Twitter Share Where is the indigenous consultation for the water impact and Fisheries and Oceans 🇨🇦? Not just the land use when on the water. on Linkedin Email Where is the indigenous consultation for the water impact and Fisheries and Oceans 🇨🇦? Not just the land use when on the water. link

    Where is the indigenous consultation for the water impact and Fisheries and Oceans 🇨🇦? Not just the land use when on the water.

    Judy asked 3 months ago

    Thank you for your question, Judy. Consultation with representatives from various technical, governmental, and Indigenous groups is part of the by-law template development work. The initial steps are underway and results will be included as the project progresses.

Page published: 04 Sep 2024, 07:12 AM